Which scenario would justify an increase in force used by an officer?

The scenario involving a subject showing signs of aggression justifies an increase in force used by an officer because it poses a potential threat to the officer's safety and the safety of others. When an individual exhibits aggressive behavior, such as yelling, making aggressive gestures, or approaching the officer in a threatening manner, the situation escalates. Officers are trained to assess threats and respond proportionately to the level of danger they face.

In this context, the use of force must be reasonable and necessary to control the situation and ensure safety. The officer has a duty to protect not only themselves but also bystanders and the individual in question. Therefore, the assessment of aggression triggers the need for a more robust response. This aligns with the principles of use of force, which emphasize an escalation of force in direct response to an immediate threat or resistance.

In contrast, scenarios like a minor traffic stop or a peaceful protest do not inherently suggest an increased risk of aggression or violence, and sudden weather changes do not typically justify an increase in force. These situations can generally be managed through verbal communication or standard policing techniques without resorting to force.